<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Patent Attorneys</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/category/Patent-Attorneys</link><description>Patent Attorneys</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:33:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Patent-suit award: $25 million</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1158979</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1158979</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:46:14 GMT</pubDate><description>Patent-suit award: $25 million</description></item><item><title>How To Avoid The Patent Trap</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1152498</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1152498</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:46:34 GMT</pubDate><description>How To Avoid The Patent Trap</description></item><item><title>Dateline Pittsburgh: 10/25/06</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1152272</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1152272</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:46:23 GMT</pubDate><description>Dateline Pittsburgh: 10/25/06</description></item><item><title>Rehearing in Lipitor Appeal is Denied: The Federal Circuit Preserves Its Prior Decision</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1144465</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1144465</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:46:01 GMT</pubDate><description>Rehearing in Lipitor Appeal is Denied: The Federal Circuit Preserves Its Prior Decision</description></item><item><title>Calif. Shops Sue for 'Surf City' Rights</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1136135</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1136135</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:45:35 GMT</pubDate><description>Calif. Shops Sue for 'Surf City' Rights</description></item><item><title>WARF Stem Cell Patents to Be Re-Examined; Patent Office Finds 'Substantial Question' Regarding Validity of WARF's Claim</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1127920</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1127920</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 10:45:50 GMT</pubDate><description>WARF Stem Cell Patents to Be Re-Examined; Patent Office Finds 'Substantial Question' Regarding Validity of WARF's Claim</description></item><item><title>King &amp; Spalding Adds Tony Askew, Steve Schaetzel and Jim Johnson as Partners in Its Intellectual Property Group</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1119652</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1119652</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:45:50 GMT</pubDate><description>King &amp; Spalding Adds Tony Askew, Steve Schaetzel and Jim Johnson as Partners in Its Intellectual Property Group</description></item><item><title>Speedy disposal of IPRs cases underlined</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1111444</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1111444</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:46:30 GMT</pubDate><description>Speedy disposal of IPRs cases underlined</description></item><item><title>GOP Fundraiser Noe Sentenced; Validates Baumgartner</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1102938</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1102938</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:46:00 GMT</pubDate><description>GOP Fundraiser Noe Sentenced; Validates Baumgartner</description></item><item><title>Bristol-Myers and Sanofi Get Apotex to Stop</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1072354</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1072354</guid><pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 02:45:58 GMT</pubDate><description>Bristol-Myers and Sanofi Get Apotex to Stop</description></item><item><title>(IP) Diligence Pays Off</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1069169</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1069169</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 04:46:04 GMT</pubDate><description>(IP) Diligence Pays Off</description></item><item><title>Apple to settle patent suits for $100 million</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1041067</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1041067</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:45:34 GMT</pubDate><description>Apple to settle patent suits for $100 million</description></item><item><title>Patent Reform Bills Do Not Forget the Details</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1036602</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1036602</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:45:41 GMT</pubDate><description>Patent Reform Bills Do Not Forget the Details</description></item><item><title>Drug makers try to block generic Plavix</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1008751</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1008751</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:45:35 GMT</pubDate><description>Drug makers try to block generic Plavix</description></item><item><title>Luke Anderson Joins Merchant &amp; Gould’s Atlanta Office</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1004861</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/1004861</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:45:36 GMT</pubDate><description>Luke Anderson Joins Merchant &amp; Gould’s Atlanta Office</description></item><item><title>Bristol-Myers sees generic Plavix rival</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/976929</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/976929</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 06:45:30 GMT</pubDate><description>Bristol-Myers sees generic Plavix rival</description></item><item><title>Zyprexa Lawsuits - Eli Lilly May Lose Insurance Coverage</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/972423</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/972423</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:45:40 GMT</pubDate><description>Zyprexa Lawsuits - Eli Lilly May Lose Insurance Coverage</description></item><item><title>Patent growth: Shutts &amp; Bowen grows Tampa office to 11</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/944060</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/944060</guid><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:45:33 GMT</pubDate><description>Patent growth: Shutts &amp; Bowen grows Tampa office to 11</description></item><item><title>Fla. Bar Approves IP for Specialty Certification</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/939738</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/939738</guid><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 20:45:42 GMT</pubDate><description>Fla. Bar Approves IP for Specialty Certification</description></item><item><title>Group challenges Wisconsin stem cell patents</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/911480</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/911480</guid><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:45:40 GMT</pubDate><description>Group challenges Wisconsin stem cell patents</description></item><item><title>Attorneys Approve Oracle's Patent-Troll Wrangling</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/906815</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/906815</guid><pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:45:36 GMT</pubDate><description>Attorneys Approve Oracle's Patent-Troll Wrangling</description></item><item><title>Local physician sued for drug patent violation</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/878710</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/878710</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:45:35 GMT</pubDate><description>Local physician sued for drug patent violation</description></item><item><title>Should Ethics Play a Special Role in Patent Law?</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/873627</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/873627</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:45:57 GMT</pubDate><description>Should Ethics Play a Special Role in Patent Law?</description></item><item><title>NZer Appointed to Aussie Attorney Standards Board</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/845717</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/845717</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 02:45:58 GMT</pubDate><description>NZer Appointed to Aussie Attorney Standards Board</description></item><item><title>Red Hat hit by patent claims over Hibernate</title><link>http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/840154</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://attorney.blog57.com/posts/840154</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 16:45:39 GMT</pubDate><description>Red Hat hit by patent claims over Hibernate</description></item></channel></rss>